A wedding photography moment captured on the day

Framing a Wedding Photograph: Letting Doorways and Arches Do the Work

A doorway does two jobs at once. It lets a person through, and it tells the eye exactly where to look while they're doing it. Photographers have been borrowing that second job for as long as there have been doorways to borrow — and a wedding, with its churches, homesteads, marquees and wine-estate cellars, tends to hand a photographer more of them than almost any other kind of day.

Framing, as a compositional idea, is simple to describe and endlessly varied to use: you place something in the scene — an arch, a window, a run of branches, even the edge of a veil or a cluster of guests' shoulders — so that it partly surrounds the real subject. The frame doesn't need to be complete. A single dark edge of stone along one side of the picture, or a soft blur of leaves crowding the top corner, can be enough to make the eye understand where it's meant to settle. What framing does, in effect, is add a layer between the viewer and the subject, and that layer does real work: it adds depth, it quietens a background that might otherwise compete for attention, and it turns "a photo of two people standing somewhere" into "a photo of two people standing somewhere specific."

South Africa's wedding venues are generous with this kind of opportunity. A Cape Dutch gable over a doorway gives a clean, pale arch to shoot through. A wine-estate cellar door, thick and low, does the same in stone. An oak avenue in the Winelands can frame a couple with branches meeting overhead like a green ceiling. A thatched lapa at a bush wedding offers its own low, round entrance. None of these need to be arranged — they're usually just standing there, waiting for someone walking through them to be photographed doing exactly that, ideally mid-step rather than posed and still.

The best framing tends to happen when it isn't the main event. A photographer working a wedding well is usually watching for it rather than manufacturing it — noticing that the couple's route to the reception happens to pass under a particular arch, or that a doorway lines up with where the light is falling, and being ready when the moment and the architecture meet. Framing that's too deliberately posed can look exactly like what it is: two people told to stand under a nice arch for a photo. Framing that's caught in motion — a bride glancing back through a doorway, a groom laughing as he ducks under a low stone lintel — tends to read as something that actually happened, which is usually the more interesting picture anyway.

It's also worth remembering that a frame doesn't have to be architectural at all. A crowd of guests raising their arms can form an arch of its own around a couple's exit. A loosely held veil, caught by wind, can curve across a corner of the frame and do the same job as a windowsill. Even a longer lens, held at the right distance, can turn a foreground of out-of-focus figures into a soft frame around whoever's in focus behind them. The principle stays the same regardless of what's providing it: give the eye an edge to travel past before it reaches the subject, and the subject will feel more found than simply photographed.

Book your wedding photography   Enquire about your date